Army stinger program office

The latter item could then be placed on another launch tube after being removed from an expended launch tube, which would be thrown away after launch.

March 75 The accuracy of the STINGER's target adaptive guidance was demonstrated against a maneuvering target for the first time when a guided test vehicle made a direct hit on a jet target while performing a 4g up maneuver.

This launch against a QT target employing tactical countermeasures resulted in the physical intercept and destruction of the target.

During this test phase, STINGER demonstrated a capability against point source and plume targets jet aircraft , performing maneuvers and employing tactical countermeasures. It also engaged high speed, direct oncoming targets. May-June 76 U. However, the team recommended that the technical objectives of the program should not be compromised because of schedule demand. July 81 The U. The two-phase program consisted of controlled tests to measure system capability and free play exercises to determine system utility.

June 82 Tactical troops from the U. The member nations approved Switzerland's participation, but the Swiss made no commitment during this year. The RMP would expand the functional control of microprocessors in the electronics and permit the reprogramming of the system logic through an externally accessible program module.

The MLMS was actually a two-missile concept: one missile to be developed for an air-to-air role and the other for an air defense suppression role. Because there were different operational capability dates for the two concepts, this MOU applied only to the air-to-air missile. September 83 A joint evaluation of the unsolicited proposal submitted by General Dynamics and Bell Helicopter Textron, Incorporated, for engineering development of the air-to-air MLMS culminated in a decision to accept the contractors' proposal but only with some technical modifications.

The deployment of 27 STINGER teams against Cuban and local forces on the Caribbean island provided a valuable learning experience for both the paratroopers and the chain of command. Questions about the system's manportability as well as other needs were raised by the assault.

Army Air Defense Board completed an evaluation of the U. These tests indicated that foam cushioned packs would provide protection for the weapon during jumps.

The Natick Research and Development Laboratories subsequently tested prototypes of the proposed jump packs and determined that the pack was too large for safe exit of the C aircraft as well as larger than the exit passage from the C aircraft. As a result, the 82d Airborne's interest in the pack ended, but that of the Rangers continued.

This equipment went to Korea. He also agreed to justify the reprogramming of funds with the House Armed Services Committee, which did not accept the threat assessment and believed the RMP to be a high technical risk. Before year's end, the U. The implementing arrangement was signed the following day.

The first production missile, fired against an MQM subscale drone employing specification rate countermeasures, resulted in a direct hit. November 86 Technical and operational tests and evaluations of the three candidate PMS systems began during this month. The effective date of this withdrawal was 30 June July 87 Testing and evaluation of the three candidate PMS systems was completed.

This was the last country to ratify the MOU. Army's current need. AVENGER was the only air defense system to successfully complete all environmental testing and a grueling hours reliability demonstration.

November 90 To support ODS, the contractor accelerated delivery of the Modification IV software, the latest upgrade programmed into the externally accessible module in the gripstock.

The contractor delivered about 2, modules in the November-December time frame to fill requirements for the U. Another 1, modules were completed by February Department of Defense: Terms of Use. Communications using, or data stored on, this IS are not private, are subject to routine monitoring, interception, and search, and may be disclosed or used for any USG-authorized purpose.

This IS includes security measures e. Notwithstanding the above, using this IS does not constitute consent to PM, LE, or CI investigative searching or monitoring of the content of privileged communications, or work product, related to personal representation or services by attorneys, psychotherapists, or clergy, and their assistants.

Such communications and work product are private and confidential. See User Agreement for details.